Guess what: Good news! I am the mayor, the governor, and the president, and I am hereby expunging any and all notions of the so-called fashion faux-pas.
(According to my Dictionary Widget, the informal use of ‘faux-pas’ connotes ‘boo-boo’ or ‘blooper.’ Adorable!)
As mayor, am having to make some nonsense cuts in WELIKEITHAUTEville. Tough times. So. Fashion Police – you’re fired. Fashion rules, same.
Because I’m making black-with-brown OK. And brown-with-navy, too. And black-with-navy, three! And wearing white whenever you want. (Speaking of which, if anyone can provide an accurate historical context for the Labor Day rule, you will be made Vice Mayor.)
The most basic point here is enough with cockamamy rules. On the one hand, bless their hearts, because they’re a lot of fun. Here is an “Accessories Faux Pas,” found on The Internet, for example:
Dark socks with white shoes. Also, white socks with dark shoes. (Think Michael Jackson.)
Wrong again, womensfashion.suite101.com! Saw this done about two days ago and it was beautiful. (Full disclosure: my dark socks, my white shoes.)
The only rules worth subscribing to are shape shifters with great flexibility and relativity, that prefer to delicately suggest rather than prescribe. (Unless it’s something about wearing what fits your body, because that is the truth.) From what I can tell, fashion — much like other arts and fun — has a lot to do with testing and stretching boundaries, when not totally disregarding them to begin with. So why establish rigid, mutually exclusive rules? Maybe to later have something to break, but otherwise, forgetaboutem.




